Category Archives: Consumer Electronics

Kindle Review

I have seen the future of books, and it is the Kindle. Or maybe Kindle rev. 2 will be anyway.

Product Image

Having witness the repeated failure of several electronic book efforts in the past, I was pessimistic. But now I believe. Amazon’s new approach to the electronic book has successfully tackled several of the key barriers that stymied earlier efforts with a very well-executed end-to-end service on top of an aggressive device design. And while there are still a few warts on the Kindle typical of most first-generation consumer electronics products, it is clearly pointing to a very interesting future.

As an avid reader with an extensive personal library of fiction, non-fiction, and technical books (as the numerous bookshelves scattered about the house and the 40 boxes of books in my garage will attest) the idea of forgoing the heft and ease of browsing and reference was a daunting one. And yet, I acknowledge having suffered under challenges of managing both the library and the habit, particularly while traveling. I have come to resign myself to allocating at least 10-12 pounds of luggage space to carry the books and magazines necessary to fuel a week-long trip when I might not otherwise have time to stop at a book store on the way.

So when the Kindle emerged, bolstered by the ~90,000 title library, I was intrigued. So I convinced a friend of mine with a similar early-adopter bent to loan me one for a couple weeks while I traveled in Europe and the US. I hoped to be able to load it up before traveling abroad, and so save some weight. I anticipated a few primary areas of potential concern surrounding usability, ergonomics, and the image quality and readability of the E-ink display.

The integrated 3-G wireless system (using Sprint’s 3G CDMA network, which while fine in the US, fails to roam internationally—so I had to load it up while in the US before leaving the country.) was already pre-provisioned on the device and linked to my Amazon account, which made it completely trivial to download half a dozen books from various best-seller and “New and Noteworthy” type lists, and a built in search feature made it equally trivial to purchase a couple more esoteric science fiction titles for some brain candy. The wireless service, while not competitive with my snappy broadband connection at home, was perfectly adequate to the task of downloading the books, and had generally delivered ordered titles within about 10 seconds. But mostly, it just worked. I also purchased copies of The NY Times, SF Chronicle, Washington Post, WSJ, SJ Merc. News, Time Magazine, and the Atlantic Monthly. In the purchase process, I found the magazine library to be the most limited, but I did like the push-delivery feature of both the newspapers and the magazines, where subscriptions are automatically delivered to the device. It was nice not to have to stop by the news stand on the way to the plane. The stuff was just on the device without having to worry about it.

Even before I got on the plane, I was feeling pretty good about storing all the books, papers and mags on the 10 ounce Kindle, and enjoying the uncharacteristically light heft of my luggage. And I was feeling greener than ever when I realized how much paper I had just avoided purchasing, along with the fact that there was going to be no land-fill impact from my reading addiction, and perhaps even some jet fuel savings as well (there was a great article not to long ago on how one airline had saved something like $230 million in fuel expenses the first year they instituted a policy of removing as many magazines as possible from the planes between flights.). The titles were also about 1/3 the retail price of the books.

A couple quick mental calculations were illuminating. In terms of personal cost, even at the hefty early-adopter price of $399 for the Kindle electronics, at my rate of reading, because the electronic versions were significantly discounted from the paper versions burdened with production and shipping costs (magazines were roughly 1/4 to 1/5 the paper price and books were between 1/3 and 1/2 the paper price), I would recover the cost of the device purchase inside of 2 months. Yes. I read A LOT.

Moreover, I realize that in terms of potential national impact, if everyone in the US went electronic just in their newspaper habits, i.e. if everyone received their newspapers via Kindle instead of having them printed on paper and delivered to their door, the savings in fuel costs for distribution alone would likely fulfill the nation’s obligations under the Kyoto accord. And there would obviously be further green benefits from leaving all the trees standing to help sequester more CO2. (My wife is probably having heart palpitations at the prospect of a greener husband.)

Yes, yes, sorry about the green diversion. Back to books and reading. My first flight with the device, a one-stopper from SFO to Zurich, was a resounding success. The size and overall form-factor of the device made reading books and flipping pages easier than with the real thing. Newspapers became manageable even in the cramped airplane seating which would otherwise require much folding, refolding, and apologizing the neighbors. I didn’t even utter the obligatory curses when the person in front of me slammed their seat back up under my chin.

Even though, the E-ink screen re-write was slow (about 600 ms) compared to LCD panels, it was still faster and easier to click the button your thumb was resting on than to flip a real paper page. The screen resolution is fantastic, and the text is very readable even at the smallest font size, which makes an electronic book mimic a regular paperback in terms of words-per-page. The contrast could be better (only about 100:1 because the high-res black text sits on a background that is gray rather than white), but in the proper diffuse lighting (standard plane lamps were fine) I had no difficulties whatsoever even with my aging eyes. The fact that the display appears to be only black and white with no grayscale limits picture rendering to dithered images. So I think there are going to be delays in the transition for many media that are more image dependent, like Wired, or Cosmo, say, but the model clearly works for most text-centric media, and it is simply a matter of time until future generations of the device/service expand to support the entire industry.

paper-like screen

After using the device all week in Switzerland, and making the return flight to the US without having had to recharge the unit even once, I said a short mental eulogy to the paper books and magazines. Their days are numbered. From now on, I’ll be doing as much reading on the Kindle and its progeny as possible. In several years, I might not even need a bookshelf anymore. How about that? An electronic gadget that enhances Feng Shuei!

==========================
Here are a few observations on things that should, and will likely, improve in subsequent versions of the product.

1.) There are too many next and previous page buttons, and their current positioning makes them too easy to press accidentally. There is no easy and obvious way to hold the device or hand the device to someone without advancing a page unless you are REALLY careful. Smaller and fewer buttons, placed on the front of the device where thumbs naturally rest would be sufficient.

2.) The current buttons look designed to be really cheap and simple to manufacture, but are open to dirt and look easy to break off with rough or extended use because of overhangs at the device edge and open gaps between the buttons and the overall device chassis. Future versions should take note of lessons from the mobile phone industry which now have closed single-membrane front faces or continuous touch screens with no gaps for dirt or mechanical failure.

3.) I would have preferred a slightly larger screen, along with the possibility of having that extra horizontal and vertical real estate potentially reduce the thickness or depth of the device.

4.) A simple anti-reflection coating on the front surface of the e-ink panel would substantially improve the display performance and readability with more specular lighting.

5.) the qwerty keyboard would benefit from being virtual on a larger touch-screen display, because you really only use it in the purchase phase, and not at all while reading, which is how you spend the majority of usage time. It would be nice if it could go away when you’re not using it. I realize, however, that the current E-Ink display is too slow to offer UI feedback, so some development will be necessary there.

6.) The power and wireless buttons need to be moved to the front or sides of the device. It’s a pain in the ass to have to flip the unit over to find the buttons.

7.) While the white plastic unit case does evoke the color of a regular book page, it also collects dirt and smudges from being in a briefcase. And while it does come with a leather cover, my inclination was to discard it because of the extra size and weight it adds. Again, lessons from the cellular phone and PDA industry would be instructive regarding enhanced metallic and textured finishes that are more attractive and wear better at little additional cost.

8.) The overall UI design was generally utilitarian, but clearly suffers from the slow update rate of the E-ink display. Menus take too damn long to load because they require a complete screen re-write cycle. There is a clever hack using a small PDLC display and scroll wheel on the side of the main display, but it is clearly a hack. I would recommend looking at figuring out how to do partial screen refreshes at faster update rates, i.e. only re-write the menu window to see if there isn’t some way to speed that up. (the current version seems to gray-out the contents in the main window to forward the menu, but I think there might be a better trade-off in leaving the background and speeding up the menu refresh to improve navigation. This would be a nice area to explore in conjunction with making a virtual keyboard using a touch-screen interface.

9.) Regarding the e-book format, it would be nice to have this be an open format that I could read on any device. While I don’t expect my laptop battery to over a competitive platform to well-designed Kindle-type tablet for extended reading sessions, I would love to have electronic reference books available for my laptop.

=================

Keep in mind here, that I’m notably particular about gadget design, and that even with these first-generation flaws, I think the device is a winner. I’m definitely looking forward to the next revision. In summary, if you’re a casual or infrequent reader, I’m not sure this is a device or service for you. But for the avid reader, particularly you mobile ones, don’t wait. Get one now.

2 Comments

Filed under Consumer Electronics

35 Years of HP Calculators

Here’s the HP nostalgia piece.

Leave a comment

Filed under Consumer Electronics

Active Matrix Organic LEDs Get Real

This is a watershed moment in consumer electronics! For decades now, LCD panel technology has dominated portable consumer electronics despite its need for power-hungry back-lights. The newer AM-OLEDs that are self-emmisive (requiring no back-light) have been in development since around the time I started MicroDisplay in 1995, with some early applications emerging over the last few years in tiny segmented character display applications like MP3 players.

Well today’s news held the first product announcements from Samsung and Philips/LG to show the new technology in active matrix formats that can display high quality video (albeit still in limited QVGA resolution.)

What will this mean for Joe-consumer? Well, our sexy gadgets are going to get even smaller, thinner [about half a MILLIMETER in thickness], and draw even less power than before (allowing the batteries to be smaller and thinner as well.) Oh yes, and the viewing angles and contrast [10,000:1] will be much better than for LCDs. Check out these images from AVING.net.

Leave a comment

Filed under Consumer Electronics

Behold the Glide Toaster

Hat tip to Gizmodo.

2o.jpg

3o.jpg

More details here.

1 Comment

Filed under Consumer Electronics

Vanity Cameras With Slimming Effect

HP has just released a new digital camera that includes a new image processing feature they dub the “Slimming Effect.”


There’s no miracle weight loss here, just a simple horizontal stretch transformation which compresses the center of an image and stretches the edges. (Note to the unwary: don’t try this one if your wife is near the edge of the image. She won’t thank you for it.)

So now we can trade off apparent poundage for reduced cranial volume and that ever-memorable cone-head sort of look.

I’m sure it will become a standard Photoshop filter within a 30 days. Who knows? This might even open up the fashion industry to the non-anorexic!

1 Comment

Filed under Consumer Electronics, Technology

My Favorite Televisions: Part 1

After having started MicroDisplay a few years back, every now and then, someone asks we which television they should buy. Assuming you can convince your SO to tolerate some new living room accessories, now is actually an excellent time to be thinking about investing in a large number of new pixels. The prices are actually starting to become reasonable for some serious high-quality screen acreage.

There is a new wave of televisions arriving on the market supporting the latest high-definition “standard” DVD players coming out. The nice thing about standards today is that there are so many of them to choose from, what with Blue-Ray and HD-DVDs and all.

As far as the television sets go, if you happen to wander into a Fry’s or Magnolia Hi-Fi (The Best Buys and Circuit Cities of the world tend to stock the lower-end mass-market models) and ask for one of the better sets, the average commission-seeking sales associate will probably steer you towards one of the new 1080P sets. This means that the set supports the highest-resolution progressive (not interlaced) video modes being output by the new DVD gear, and hopefully by some of the forthcoming cable and satellite boxes (but don’t hold your breath on those.) I’ve seen two that I really liked, and a few that didn’t impress me.

The first unit that actually made me stop in my tracks as I was walking by, was the new 56 inch Samsung DLP rear-projection unit (HL-S5688W). It was being driven by a demo Blue-Ray DVD running in the Samsung player in the back of the Concord, CA Fry’s Electronics. This was easily one of the best consumer televisions I had every seen, and the price was just over $3,000. The only flaws I could point out were issues intrinsic to all rear-projection televisions:

a.) The screen gain was still a little high, meaning that the rear-projection screen was designed to focus the light from the projection optics to those areas from which a viewer was most likely to be watching to the point that the extent of the acceptable viewing angle was narrower than I would like in my living room, and as a result, the image characterstics still change notably as you walk across the room.

b.) As with most rear-projection systems, it’s great in a dark room, but when the lights come up for any reason, you get a lot of reflected ambient light on the screen, which significantly lowers the contrast and apparent brightness of the image.

But note that these flaws are only really noticeable by someone who has literally spent years looking for even the minutest flaws in displays with serious analytical optics, and the TV is one of the best available for any price despite these issues.

I ALMOST purchased the unit right then and there. I then discovered that Samsung’s new line of 1080P LCD screens was scheduled to reach the stores in a couple of weeks and decided to see what they would do without the rear-projection limitations. Given that their 1080i LCDs already looked pretty damn good (brighter and with better color saturation, in fact, than Plazmas now) I had rather high hopes.

Much to my surprise, when I returned to the store to compare the new Samsung 1080P LCD with the older 1080i set, which thankfully were sitting right next to each other, the older one looked MUCH better from normal viewing distances of 10-15 feet when viewing either HD or SD video via Echostar . Even after spending over half an hour fiddling with their respective color, contrast and brightness settings, it was clear that while the newer one did have very slightly better resolution (almost impossible to distinguish), the newer 1080P set had only about 70% of the other’s peak brightness, and under the normal ambient illumination of the showroom floor, that made all the difference in the perceived image quality color saturation and whatnot. Interested in the odd reduction in key image metrics, I wandered to another aisle and picked up a loupe magnifier and went back to look at the screen architecture under about 50x magnification. As I suspected, when you look REALLY closely, it becomes apparent that to fit so many more pixels into the same area, each pixel was much smaller. And since there is a fixed minimum line with the manufacturing processes can print the pixel electronics and color gel filters, the fill-factor, or ratio of transmissive area to total area is much lower. Hence the drastically lower brightness. But there was no really good apparent reason for the worse (higher black levels.)

The bottom line is that there is just no motivation whatsoever to pay the extra $800 for a worse image under those source and environmental constraints. While it is true, that the real beauty should be revealed in the newer set when driven by a true 1080P source, like Blue Ray or HD-DVD, there is precious little content out there today in the new formats. So no purchase after all, with the DLP unit still standing as my favorite.

Pioneer Elite PureVision PRO-FHD1Then I saw the new Pioneer Plasma display in the Emeryville Magnolia Hi Fi. All I can say is WOW. Absolutely flawless. This is really the best consumer television I have ever seen. Even the scalar from SD wasn’t bad. And it won a Best of CES award. I was thinking, “finally, an HD set that can unseat my current heavyweight champion.” ( A 37″ Sony XBR CRT behemoth that ways about 400 pounds and takes four people to move.) I was ready to whip out my check book until I noticed the price, a whopping $10k. Ouch. Maybe when Mobi goes public. (knock on wood.)

So far, the Pioneer Plasma is the one. With budgetary or wifely constraints, go with the DLP. A friend of mine from Mobi recently purchased the Samsung and is ecstatic with the set, though he tells me his wife occasionally complains that the unit is too bright. Sigh.

Leave a comment

Filed under Consumer Electronics